The Encyclopedia of Women Philosophers: A New Web Site Presents the Contributions of Women Philosophers, from Ancient to Modern
Our take
The sheer audacity of a comprehensive encyclopedia dedicated to women philosophers? It’s… delightfully necessary. Let's be honest, the historical record, and frankly, the contemporary landscape of academic philosophy, has been profoundly skewed. Mary Warnock’s observation about the paltry representation of women in philosophy departments—a mere 25% in Britain, and even less in the States— isn’t just a statistic; it's a symptom of a deeper systemic issue. A persistent, often unconscious, overlooking of contributions. We’ve been told, implicitly and explicitly, that philosophical inquiry is a distinctly masculine pursuit. This new website, then, is a direct challenge to that narrative, a forceful squirt of truth at a long-held assumption. It’s the razor clam of historical correction, surfacing unexpectedly and disrupting the sediment of received wisdom. It echoes the spirit of our earlier exploration of the fascinating ways language and culture shape even the most seemingly universal concepts, like swearing—see Global Swearword, Local Ideologies — because the act of naming, of defining, is always already an act of power.
The beauty of this project isn't just in compiling names and biographical details, though that's essential. It’s in actively *reconstructing* a lineage, a tradition that was deliberately obscured or simply ignored. Think about it – the very act of creating an encyclopedia is a declaration of importance. It says, “These people mattered. Their ideas mattered. And we are going to make sure everyone knows it.” It’s a form of intellectual archaeology, excavating the buried treasures of philosophical thought. This aligns with a similar spirit of discovery we highlighted in our piece on Bilingual Brain Scans, where burgeoning research is revealing the complexities of human cognition and challenging simplistic notions of what it means to think. Both projects speak to the power of re-examining established frameworks and uncovering previously unseen perspectives. One might even draw parallels to the meticulous artistry of *décopage* Découpage, where fragments of disparate elements are meticulously layered to create something new and unexpectedly beautiful – this encyclopedia does precisely that with lost or underappreciated philosophical narratives.
The implications extend far beyond simply redressing a historical imbalance. A more inclusive philosophical canon broadens the scope of inquiry itself. When perspectives traditionally marginalized are brought to the forefront, new questions emerge, old assumptions are challenged, and the very definition of "philosophy" expands. It’s about recognizing that the questions we ask – and the answers we seek – are shaped by our lived experiences, our cultural contexts, and our social positions. The absence of women's voices in philosophy has meant a narrowing of that scope, a blindness to certain realities and a prevalence of certain biases. This isn’t about “adding women” to the existing canon; it’s about fundamentally reshaping the canon itself. It's about acknowledging that philosophy has always been, and should continue to be, a dynamic, evolving conversation, open to all voices.
So, what's next? Will this encyclopedia spark a genuine shift in academic philosophy, leading to increased representation of women in departments and a re-evaluation of the curriculum? Or will it remain a laudable but ultimately isolated achievement, a digital repository of overlooked brilliance? Perhaps the most crucial question is this: How do we move beyond simply *documenting* the contributions of women philosophers and actively *integrating* their ideas into the ongoing philosophical discourse? It requires more than just awareness; it requires a willingness to confront our own biases and to challenge the deeply ingrained structures that have kept women's voices marginalized for so long. The clam has surfaced. Now, will we listen?
In a conversation with Julian Baggini on why there are so few women in academic philosophy, Mary Warnock once noted that “of all the humanities departments in British universities, only philosophy departments have a mere 25% women members.” That number is even lower in the US. “Why should this be?” Warnock asked. She asserted that the problem may lie with the discipline itself. “I think that academic philosophy has become an extraordinarily inward-looking subject,” she said, “If you pick up a professional journal now, you find little nitpicking responses to previous articles. Women tend to get more easily bored with this than men. Philosophy seems to stop being interesting just when it starts to be professional.”
It’s a provocative claim, one I’m sure many women in philosophy would contest, though the more general idea that academic philosophy has become an arid practice divorced from real life concerns might have wider support. The data on women in academic philosophy presents a very complex picture. “No single intervention is likely to change the climate,” as Tania Lombrozo writes at NPR. Explicit and implicit biases do play a role, as do instances of sexual harassment and coercion by those in positions of power. But another significant issue Warnock seemed to ignore is the way that philosophy is generally taught at the undergraduate level.
In the research on which Lombrozo reports, studies found that “the biggest drop in the proportion of women in the philosophy pipeline seems to be from enrollment in an introductory philosophy class to becoming a philosophy major. At Georgia State, for example, women make up about 55 percent of Introduction to Philosophy students but only around 33 percent of philosophy majors.” This may have to do with the fact that “readings on the syllabus were overwhelmingly by men (over 89 percent).” As Georgia State graduate student Morgan Thompson explained at a conference in 2013:
This problem is compounded by the fact that introductory philosophy textbooks have an even worse gender balance; women account for only 6 percent of authors in a number of introductory philosophy textbooks.
Does this disparity reflect an unalterable truth about the history of philosophy? No, and it can very well be remedied. The Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists is working to do that with a new site, the Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers. The joint project of Paderborn University’s Ruth Hagengruber and Cleveland State’s Mary Ellen Waithe, this resource aims to introduce “women philosophers who mostly have been omitted from the philosophical canon despite their historical and philosophical influence.” So far, reports Daily Nous, “there are around 100 entries… with more to be added every few months.”
Each entry is written by a recognized scholar. The easy-to-navigate site has four main sections: Concepts, Keywords, Philosophers, and Contributors. There are a few names most people will recognize, like Mary Wollstonecraft, Ayn Rand, and Simone de Beauvoir. But most of these thinkers will seem obscure, despite their meaningful contributions to various fields of thought. Integrating these philosophers into syllabi and textbooks could go a long way toward retaining women in philosophy departments. As importantly, it will broaden the tradition, giving all students a wider range of perspectives.
For example, much of the academic work on social ethics in democracy might reference Adam Smith’s “Theory of Moral Sentiments” or the prolific 20th century work of John Dewey. But it might overlook the work of Dewey’s contemporary Jane Addams (top), who also wrote critical studies on democracy and education and who “sees a connection,” writes Maurice Hamington in a short entry about her, “between sympathetic understanding and a robust democracy.… For Addams, it is crucial that citizens in a democracy engage with one another to reach across difference to care and find common cause.”
Addams brought her philosophical concerns into real world practice. She made important interventions in the treatment of immigrants and African-Americans in Chicago, supported working mothers, and helped pass child protection laws and end child labor. But while she has long been renowned as a social reformer and Nobel Peace Prize winner, “the dynamics of canon formation,” notes the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “resulted in her philosophical work being largely ignored until the 1990s.” Now, many philosophers recognize that works like Democracy and Social Ethics anticipated key contemporary issues in political philosophy a century ago.
Other thinkers in the Encyclopedia of Concise Concepts by Women Philosophers like Diotima of Mantinea (whom Socrates revered) and early American thinker Mercy Otis Warren made important contributions to the theories of beauty and government, respectively. Yet they may receive no more than a footnote in most undergraduate philosophy courses. This may have less to do with explicit bias than with the way professors themselves have been educated. But the history, and current practice, of philosophy needs the inclusion of these views. Learn more about many historically overlooked women in philosophy at the Encyclopedia here.
Note: An earlier version of this post appeared on our site in 2018.
Related Content:
The Contributions of Women Philosophers Recovered by the New Project Vox Website
An Animated Introduction to the Feminist Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir
An Animated Introduction to the Feminist Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir
Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC.
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience